Rom China Medical University, Asia University, and the Health Promotion Administration. We are grateful for use of the National Health Insurance Research Database and the Cancer Register Files provided by Statistic Center of Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: SJC PTK WCT. Performed the experiments: fpsyg.2017.00209 SJC PTK KHH WCT. Analyzed the data: PTK KHH YHW WCT. Contributed reagents/materials/ analysis tools: SJC PTK KHH YHW WCT. Wrote the paper: SJC YHW WCT.
Personality traits change throughout the lifespan [1]. There are differing views on the costs and benefits of this change. Some psychologists have marshaled evidence to support the claim that stability lies at the root of greater well-being, and they portray both growth and decline as costly to well-being [2]. Others have demonstrated that positive trait change causes greater well-being, and suggested that growth, no matter how much, is beneficial [3]. We investigate the merits of both perspectives, reconciling them in a way that reflects the Goldilocks hypothesis. That is, when it comes to subjective well-being (SWB), a small amount of positive trait change isn’t enough, and a large amount of positive trait change is too much, but a moderate amount of change is conducive to promoting well-being. We investigate the Goldilocks hypothesis of positive trait change using non-linear modeling of the impact of traitPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0131316 July 10,1 /Investigating the Goldilocks Hypothesischange, because the Goldilocks hypothesis predicts a non-monotonic MonocrotalineMedChemExpress Crotaline relationship of positive trait change with subjective well-being (SWB). Over time, SWB should increase linearly with positive trait change until it reaches an apex after which continued change results in decreasing SWB.Perspectives on Stability and ChangeThere is a dialectical opposition between continuity and change in classical thought. In support of change, Socrates uttered his famous dictum, “Know thyself,” thus idealizing the continuous accumulation of self-knowledge across one’s lifespan. In contrast, the Stoic philosophers put forth a moral vision of statis and indifference. To attain the ideal life, Stoics argued, individuals should learn to accept the vicissitudes of life and remain unperturbed wcs.1183 by them. For Stoics, personality stability Hexanoyl-Tyr-Ile-Ahx-NH2 supplier rather than growth was ideal. Similarly, the philosophical traditions of East and South Asia, which include Hinduism and Buddhism, emphasize equanimity, a form of personality stability. In such traditions, a common feature is the sacralization of a liberated state (e.g., nirvana in Buddhism, or VelpatasvirMedChemExpress GS-5816 moksha in Hinduism), after which human striving ceases and stability is attained. Today, one sees a greater emphasis on change and growth, especially in Western cultures, a phenomenon that derives from the legacy of existentialism and humanism. Existentialist philosophers emphasized struggle, personal transformation and distinctiveness as being necessary to an authentic life. Humanists like Carl Rogers claimed that psychological health resulted from purchase Leupeptin (hemisulfate) becoming one’s “true” or authentic self [4]. In short, positive personal change was framed as beneficial and necessary to an individual’s well-being or happiness. Such framing is evident in synonyms of positive change, which include self-enhancement, improvement, growth, attainment, and maturity.Personality Trait Change Over the LifespanTrait profiles have high rank-order stability, indicating.Rom China Medical University, Asia University, and the Health Promotion Administration. We are grateful for use of the National Health Insurance Research Database and the Cancer Register Files provided by Statistic Center of Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: SJC PTK WCT. Performed the experiments: fpsyg.2017.00209 SJC PTK KHH WCT. Analyzed the data: PTK KHH YHW WCT. Contributed reagents/materials/ analysis tools: SJC PTK KHH YHW WCT. Wrote the paper: SJC YHW WCT.
Personality traits change throughout the lifespan [1]. There are differing views on the costs and benefits of this change. Some psychologists have marshaled evidence to support the claim that stability lies at the root of greater well-being, and they portray both growth and decline as costly to well-being [2]. Others have demonstrated that positive trait change causes greater well-being, and suggested that growth, no matter how much, is beneficial [3]. We investigate the merits of both perspectives, reconciling them in a way that reflects the Goldilocks hypothesis. That is, when it comes to subjective well-being (SWB), a small amount of positive trait change isn’t enough, and a large amount of positive trait change is too much, but a moderate amount of change is conducive to promoting well-being. We investigate the Goldilocks hypothesis of positive trait change using non-linear modeling of the impact of traitPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0131316 July 10,1 /Investigating the Goldilocks Hypothesischange, because the Goldilocks hypothesis predicts a non-monotonic relationship of positive trait change with subjective well-being (SWB). Over time, SWB should increase linearly with positive trait change until it reaches an apex after which continued change results in decreasing SWB.Perspectives on Stability and ChangeThere is a dialectical opposition between continuity and change in classical thought. In support of change, Socrates uttered his famous dictum, “Know thyself,” thus idealizing the continuous accumulation of self-knowledge across one’s lifespan. In contrast, the Stoic philosophers put forth a moral vision of statis and indifference. To attain the ideal life, Stoics argued, individuals should learn to accept the vicissitudes of life and remain unperturbed wcs.1183 by them. For Stoics, personality stability rather than growth was ideal. Similarly, the philosophical traditions of East and South Asia, which include Hinduism and Buddhism, emphasize equanimity, a form of personality stability. In such traditions, a common feature is the sacralization of a liberated state (e.g., nirvana in Buddhism, or moksha in Hinduism), after which human striving ceases and stability is attained. Today, one sees a greater emphasis on change and growth, especially in Western cultures, a phenomenon that derives from the legacy of existentialism and humanism. Existentialist philosophers emphasized struggle, personal transformation and distinctiveness as being necessary to an authentic life. Humanists like Carl Rogers claimed that psychological health resulted from becoming one’s “true” or authentic self [4]. In short, positive personal change was framed as beneficial and necessary to an individual’s well-being or happiness. Such framing is evident in synonyms of positive change, which include self-enhancement, improvement, growth, attainment, and maturity.Personality Trait Change Over the LifespanTrait profiles have high rank-order stability, indicating.Rom China Medical University, Asia University, and the Health Promotion Administration. We are grateful for use of the National Health Insurance Research Database and the Cancer Register Files provided by Statistic Center of Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: SJC PTK WCT. Performed the experiments: fpsyg.2017.00209 SJC PTK KHH WCT. Analyzed the data: PTK KHH YHW WCT. Contributed reagents/materials/ analysis tools: SJC PTK KHH YHW WCT. Wrote the paper: SJC YHW WCT.
Personality traits change throughout the lifespan [1]. There are differing views on the costs and benefits of this change. Some psychologists have marshaled evidence to support the claim that stability lies at the root of greater well-being, and they portray both growth and decline as costly to well-being [2]. Others have demonstrated that positive trait change causes greater well-being, and suggested that growth, no matter how much, is beneficial [3]. We investigate the merits of both perspectives, reconciling them in a way that reflects the Goldilocks hypothesis. That is, when it comes to subjective well-being (SWB), a small amount of positive trait change isn’t enough, and a large amount of positive trait change is too much, but a moderate amount of change is conducive to promoting well-being. We investigate the Goldilocks hypothesis of positive trait change using non-linear modeling of the impact of traitPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0131316 July 10,1 /Investigating the Goldilocks Hypothesischange, because the Goldilocks hypothesis predicts a non-monotonic relationship of positive trait change with subjective well-being (SWB). Over time, SWB should increase linearly with positive trait change until it reaches an apex after which continued change results in decreasing SWB.Perspectives on Stability and ChangeThere is a dialectical opposition between continuity and change in classical thought. In support of change, Socrates uttered his famous dictum, “Know thyself,” thus idealizing the continuous accumulation of self-knowledge across one’s lifespan. In contrast, the Stoic philosophers put forth a moral vision of statis and indifference. To attain the ideal life, Stoics argued, individuals should learn to accept the vicissitudes of life and remain unperturbed wcs.1183 by them. For Stoics, personality stability rather than growth was ideal. Similarly, the philosophical traditions of East and South Asia, which include Hinduism and Buddhism, emphasize equanimity, a form of personality stability. In such traditions, a common feature is the sacralization of a liberated state (e.g., nirvana in Buddhism, or moksha in Hinduism), after which human striving ceases and stability is attained. Today, one sees a greater emphasis on change and growth, especially in Western cultures, a phenomenon that derives from the legacy of existentialism and humanism. Existentialist philosophers emphasized struggle, personal transformation and distinctiveness as being necessary to an authentic life. Humanists like Carl Rogers claimed that psychological health resulted from becoming one’s “true” or authentic self [4]. In short, positive personal change was framed as beneficial and necessary to an individual’s well-being or happiness. Such framing is evident in synonyms of positive change, which include self-enhancement, improvement, growth, attainment, and maturity.Personality Trait Change Over the LifespanTrait profiles have high rank-order stability, indicating.Rom China Medical University, Asia University, and the Health Promotion Administration. We are grateful for use of the National Health Insurance Research Database and the Cancer Register Files provided by Statistic Center of Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: SJC PTK WCT. Performed the experiments: fpsyg.2017.00209 SJC PTK KHH WCT. Analyzed the data: PTK KHH YHW WCT. Contributed reagents/materials/ analysis tools: SJC PTK KHH YHW WCT. Wrote the paper: SJC YHW WCT.
Personality traits change throughout the lifespan [1]. There are differing views on the costs and benefits of this change. Some psychologists have marshaled evidence to support the claim that stability lies at the root of greater well-being, and they portray both growth and decline as costly to well-being [2]. Others have demonstrated that positive trait change causes greater well-being, and suggested that growth, no matter how much, is beneficial [3]. We investigate the merits of both perspectives, reconciling them in a way that reflects the Goldilocks hypothesis. That is, when it comes to subjective well-being (SWB), a small amount of positive trait change isn’t enough, and a large amount of positive trait change is too much, but a moderate amount of change is conducive to promoting well-being. We investigate the Goldilocks hypothesis of positive trait change using non-linear modeling of the impact of traitPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0131316 July 10,1 /Investigating the Goldilocks Hypothesischange, because the Goldilocks hypothesis predicts a non-monotonic relationship of positive trait change with subjective well-being (SWB). Over time, SWB should increase linearly with positive trait change until it reaches an apex after which continued change results in decreasing SWB.Perspectives on Stability and ChangeThere is a dialectical opposition between continuity and change in classical thought. In support of change, Socrates uttered his famous dictum, “Know thyself,” thus idealizing the continuous accumulation of self-knowledge across one’s lifespan. In contrast, the Stoic philosophers put forth a moral vision of statis and indifference. To attain the ideal life, Stoics argued, individuals should learn to accept the vicissitudes of life and remain unperturbed wcs.1183 by them. For Stoics, personality stability rather than growth was ideal. Similarly, the philosophical traditions of East and South Asia, which include Hinduism and Buddhism, emphasize equanimity, a form of personality stability. In such traditions, a common feature is the sacralization of a liberated state (e.g., nirvana in Buddhism, or moksha in Hinduism), after which human striving ceases and stability is attained. Today, one sees a greater emphasis on change and growth, especially in Western cultures, a phenomenon that derives from the legacy of existentialism and humanism. Existentialist philosophers emphasized struggle, personal transformation and distinctiveness as being necessary to an authentic life. Humanists like Carl Rogers claimed that psychological health resulted from becoming one’s “true” or authentic self [4]. In short, positive personal change was framed as beneficial and necessary to an individual’s well-being or happiness. Such framing is evident in synonyms of positive change, which include self-enhancement, improvement, growth, attainment, and maturity.Personality Trait Change Over the LifespanTrait profiles have high rank-order stability, indicating.