Ts with low nutritional threat was 6.1 days (.five), while the imply LOS of patients with higher nutritional danger was 8.1 days (.9) (p = 0.098). NS-IBD resulted probably the most correct tools in pre-Nutrients 2021, 13, 3899 Nutrients 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW9 of 13 9 ofTable 5. Prevalence of higher nutritional threat and malnutrition PHA-543613 Protocol diagnosis in IBD, CD and UC patients. IBD NS-IBD NRS-2002 Should MST MIRT SASKIBD-NR Sensitivity 0.92 0.84 0.6 0.6 0.84 0.52 95 CI 0.72.98 0.63.95 0.39.78 0.39.78 0.63.95 0.31.72 Specificity 0.73 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.95 95 CI 0.56.86 0.77.98 0.84.99 0.84.99 0.77.98 0.80.99 CD NS-IBD NRS-2002 Will have to MST MIRT SASKIBD-NR Sensitivity 0.86 0.eight 0.53 0.6 0.8 0.6 95 CI 0.58.97 0.51.94 0.27.77 0.32.82 0.51.94 0.32.82 Specificity 0.77 0.93 1 1 0.93 0.96 95 CI 0.58.89 0.77.98 0.86 0.86 0.77.98 0.81.99 UC NS-IBD NRS-2002 Should MST MIRT SASKIBD-NR Sensitivity 1 0.9 0.7 0.six 0.9 0.four 95 CI Specificity 95 CI PPV 95 CI NPV 95 CI Youden index 0.65 0.five 0.13.86 0.76 0.45.93 1 0.30 0.50 0.54.99 0.83 0.36.99 0.9 0.54.99 0.83 0.34.99 0.73 0.35.91 0.83 0.36.99 0.87 0.46.99 0.62 0.25.89 0.53 Figure 2. NS-IBD ROC Curve. IBD Nutritional Cholesteryl sulfate Biological Activity screening tool (NS-IBD); Receiver Operating Char0.27.86 0.83 0.36.99 0.85 0.42.99 0.55 0.22.84 0.43 acteristic 0.54.99 (ROC). 0.83 0.36.99 0.9 0.54.99 0.83 0.36.99 0.73 0.13.72 0.83 0.36.99 0.8 0.29.98 0.45 0.18.75 0.23 PPV 0.65 0.85 1 1 0.85 0.9 95 CI 0.40.83 0.56.97 0.59 0.62 0.56.97 0.54.99 NPV 0.92 0.90 0.81 0.83 0.90 0.83 95 CI 0.73.98 0.73.97 0.65.91 0.67.93 0.73.97 0.66.93 Youden index 0.63 0.73 0.53 0.53 0.73 0.56 PPV 0.7 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.87 0.87 95 CI 0.51.84 0.66.97 0.68.99 0.68.99 0.66.97 0.58.98 NPV 0.93 0.89 0.78 0.78 0.89 0.74 95 CI 0.76.99 0.74.96 0.63.88 0.63.88 0.74.96 0.59.85 Youden index 0.65 0.76 0.57 0.57 0.76 0.Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); Crohn’s illness (CD); Ulcerative colitis (UC); IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD); Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002); Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (Ought to); Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST); Malnutrition Inflammation Assessing the connection between the malnutrition danger plus the postoperative Threat Tool (MIRT); Saskatchewan IBD utrition Risk (SaskIBD-NR). length of stay (LOS) we found that as outlined by NS-IBD, the mean LOS of sufferers with3.six. Postoperative Length of Remain and Nutritional Risklow nutritional risk was six.1 days (.5), while the imply LOS of patients with high nutri3.6. Postoperative Length of Stay (p = Nutritional Threat resulted by far the most correct tools in pretional danger was eight.1 days (.9) and 0.098). NS-IBD Assessing the relationship amongst the malnutrition risk along with the postoperative length dicting LOS (Figure 3). of stay (LOS) we found that according Crohn’s disease imply Ulcerative colitis with low Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); to NS-IBD, the (CD); LOS of patients (UC); IBD nutritional threat was 6.1tool (NS-IBD); Nutritional Danger Screening 2002 (NRS-2002); MalnuNutritional Screening days (.five), even though the imply LOS of patients with high nutritional danger was eight.1 days (Screening Tool (Ought to); Malnutrition most accurate tools in predicting trition Universal .9) (p = 0.098). NS-IBD resulted the Screening Tool (MST); MalnutriLOS (Figure three). tion Inflammation Danger Tool (MIRT); Saskatchewan IBD utrition Threat (SaskIBD-NR)Figure 3. Nutritional screening outcomes in connection to the length of keep. Figure 3. Nutritional screening outcomes in partnership to the length of remain.IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD); Nutriti.