Inobacteria: vs. vs. the other folks, all p 0.0001; blue vs. Kruskal allis
Inobacteria: vs. vs. the other individuals, all p 0.0001; blue vs. Kruskal allis and Steel wass tests. Actinobacteria: red red the others, all p 0.0001; blue vs. yellow, p = 0.0369; green vs. yellow, p 0.0001. GYKI 52466 MedChemExpress Bacteroidetes: red vs. blue, p = 0.0008; red vs. yellow, p yellow, p = 0.0369; green vs. yellow, p 0.0001. Bacteroidetes: vs. vs. blue, p = 0.0008; vs. vs. yellow, low, p = 0.0369; green vs. yellow, p 0.0001. Bacteroidetes: red red blue, p = 0.0008; red red yellow, p 0.0001; blue vs. green, p 0.0001; blue vs. yellow, p 0.0001; green vs. yellow, p 0.0001. Firmicutes: 0.0001; blue blue vs. green, p blue vs. blue vs.p 0.0001; green vs. yellow, p 0.0001. Firmicutes: p vs. blue vs. green, p 0.0001; 0.0001; yellow, p = 0.0067; 0.0001; yellow, p yellow, p 0.0001. red 0.0001; and yellow, p 0.0001; red vs. green, yellow, p blue vs. green vs. 0.000; green vs. red vs. blue and yellow, pand yellow, p 0.0001; red = 0.0067; blue 0.0067; blue p 0.000; green0.000; 0.0001; red vs. green, p vs. green, p = vs. yellow, vs. yellow, p vs. Firmicutes: red yellow, p 0.0001.vs. blue yellow, vs. yellow, p 0.0001. green p 0.0001.Figure 3. Gut microbiota at the genus level with significant differences observed inside the red group. Figure three. Gut microbiota at the genus level with important variations observed in the red group. The Figure 3. Gut microbiota in the genus level with significantevaluated making use of the the red group. The The proportions of genera amongst the 4 groups were differences observed in Kruskal allis and proportions of genera among the four groups were evaluated utilizing the Kruskal allis and Steelproportions of tests. among the four groups were evaluated applying the Kruskal allis and SteelSteel wass genera Dwass tests. p 0.05.p 0.05. Dwass tests. p 0.05.Tables three and 4 show the variations inside the subjects’ characteristics amongst the four Tables three and four show the differences in the subjects’ characteristics amongst the four Tables 3 and four show the differences inhibitor and glinide PSB-603 Antagonist medication use had been 4 groups. The proportions of -glucosidasein the subjects’ traits amongst the signifgroups. The proportions of –glucosidase inhibitor and glinide medication use have been siggroups. The proportions of -glucosidase inhibitor and glinide medication use were sigicantly greater within the red group than inside the other groups. nificantly higher inside the red group than within the other groups. nificantly larger in the red group than within the other groups.Table three. Qualities of subjects with variety 2 diabetes mellitus. Table 3. Traits of subjects with kind 2 diabetes mellitus. Group Red Blue Green Group Red Blue Green Number 112 81 90 Number 112 81 90 Male sex, (n) 47.3 (53) 60.five (49) 61.1 (55) Male sex, (n) 47.3 (53) 60.five (49) 61.1 (55) Age, years, mean (SD) 67.5 (10.9) 66.2 (ten.9) 68.2 (9.five) Age, years, imply (SD) 67.5 (10.9) 66.two (10.9) 68.2 (9.five) 24.1 (four.0) 25.0 (4.9) 23.8 (3.six) BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) 24.1 (four.0) 25.0 (four.9) 23.8 (3.6) BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) Duration of diabetes, years, mean (SD) 14.eight (10.1) 13.6 (9.3) 15.1 (11.7) Duration of diabetes, years, imply (SD) 14.eight (10.1) 13.6 (9.three) 15.1 (11.7) Household history of diabetes, (n) 46.four (52) 40.7 (33) 37.eight (34) Family history of diabetes, (n) 46.four (52) 40.7 (33) 37.eight (34)Yellow Yellow one hundred one hundred 55.0 (55) 55.0 (55) 64.8 (10.9) 64.eight (ten.9) 24.2 (three.eight) 24.2 (three.eight) 12.two (eight.eight) 12.two (8.8) 53 (53) 53 (53)p Value p Value 0.172 0.172 0.122 0.122 0.295 0.295 0.164 0.164 0.16 0.Nutrients 2021, 13,6 ofTable.