Y adopt the system thinking method considering that a lot of subsystems play a role in shaping it. Inside a study carried out by Waddell (2005), relations and scales interacting with multidimensional systems were AAPK-25 References described as a modify in an in depth system according to the association inside stakeholders [39]. In education, students and teachers will be the key stakeholders, and parents, policymakers, and close surroundings are secondary stakeholders (see Figure 3). Then the social surroundings, infrastructures, along with other variables influence the education method but soon after major and secondary stakeholders. Every single parameter right here acts as a system on its personal and is interlinked to other people by means of a flow within this complex technique. Within this regard, we focused onFigure 3. A holistic education technique using systems thinking method. Figure three. A holistic education system using systems considering approach.Sustainability 2021, 13, 11525 Sustainability 2021, 13, x x FOR PEER Assessment FOR PEER Assessment Sustainability 2021, 13,eight of 33 eight of7 ofFigure four. Teachers’ qualified improvement diagram employing systems thinking. Figure four. Teachers’ experienced improvement diagram employing systems thinking. thinking. Figure four. Teachers’ professional improvement diagramFigure 5. Teachers’ expert improvement paves the way for sustainable improvement. Figure 5. Teachers’ specialist development paves the way for sustainable development. Figure five. Teachers’ qualified development paves the way for sustainable development.3.2. Interviews three.two. Interviews developed semi-structured interviews on teachers’ professional developThe remaining two phases–experimentation and evolution–require heavy and long This study procedures and developed semi-structured interviews on teachers’ prior sub-section ment according permission from the MoEHE. Thus, we completed our study just after This study to the systems considering strategy described inside the expert developconducting the ideationsystems thinking approach described in the earlier sub-section (see according for the Compound 48/80 References interview inquiries). The interviews have been performed with teachmentAppendix Bto the phase with recommendations and assigned the last two phases as future perform with for the interview questions). The interviews were performed withjour- a ers Appendix B the collaboration in the MoEHE. The fourth phase, experimentation, is (see for an in-depth contextual understanding of their experiences, desires, and career teachneys an in-depth interviews had been carried out meticulously to try new tips and profession jourpilot study andThecontextual understanding of their experiences, that dependable information were ers forin Qatar. versatile process because it allows developers to ensure desires, and go back and collected and the interviews had been conducted very carefully to ensure analysis, hence active forth inside the course of action in case something go out in the scope of thethat trustworthy dataproject neys in Qatar. that the interviewees didn’t desires improvement. In the fifth phase, were listening and nonjudgmental behavior not two the the scope with the analysis, the interowners who implement the pilot study werego out of teachers’ overall performance by therefore active collected and that the interviewees did will track critical practices adopted with respect to viewer and Teachers’ professional journeys informed the improvement of concerns the proposed recommendations and move forward. listening[40]. nonjudgmental behavior had been two important practices adopted by the interasked.